 According
to Australian Football League (AFL) Media Manager Patrick Keane, the AFL’s
existing rules and codes of conduct are more than adequate to police a case of
harassment on the basis of sexual orientation, should such a situation ever
arise.
“In terms
of Rule 30, which is called ‘Racial and Religious Vilification’, under the
terms of that, a person can lay a complaint on any form of abuse or harassment
that’s directed towards them, which includes someone who abuses or harasses you
for your sexual status,” Keane explains.
That may be
the case, but it’s also true that the AFL rule in question makes no mention of
sexual orientation; instead referring only to ‘conduct which threatens,
disparages, vilifies or insults another person on the basis of that person’s
race, religion, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin’.
Conversely,
the AFL Player’s Association (AFLPA) specifically acknowledges sexual
orientation in its Code of Conduct.
‘AFL
Players must not vilify other AFL Players on the basis of their race, religion,
colour, sex, sexual orientation or other related characteristics,’ item 3.4 of
the Code states. It also prohibits
AFL players ‘from making public comment that vilifies or tends to vilify
persons on the basis of their race, religion, colour, sex, sexual orientation
or other related characteristics’.
Dr Pippa
Grange is the AFLPA’s General Manager for Psychology, People and Culture. She
believes that acknowledging issues of sexuality such as discrimination and
vilification are important to both the AFL and
the AFLPA, but recognises that the AFLPA have “perhaps gone a little bit
further in being explicit about it”.
That said
she’s also aware that there’s much more that needs to be done on the issue.
“We can get
more explicit in the way we air topics around gender diversity and sexual
preferences ... I think that any topic that involves diversity comes from a
core value of respect, and when we talk to players about any of these topics
more broadly, we’re coming at it from that angle; but we don’t do anything
specifically to educate or raise awareness of diversity around sexual
preference or gender diversity, and that’s possibly something we can look at,
moving forward,” she explains.
Grange’s
enthusiasm for fostering acceptance of sexual diversity among the AFL’s playing
body is tempered, however, by her awareness that a culture of homophobia exists
to some degree within football circles.
“Individually,
when I speak to players one on one or in small groups, they’re really very tolerant.
I haven’t seen examples of overt, explicit or spoken homophobia,” she says.
“However,
the cultural, traditional norms that the whole group espouse are something
different. I do think that homophobia is alive and well in AFL football - as in
any groups of Australian males, particularly in traditions where the whole part
of you being involved in it is the gaining of masculine capital. It is there, but I don’t think it’s
implicitly stated, and I don’t think it’s deeply held by the individuals.”
However,
Grange is also quick to point out that generalising about AFL players as a
whole – such as suggesting that they are all
homophobic, based on the words or deeds of one or two individuals – will
not help anyone.
“What
happens then is that [the players] withdraw their voice from the conversation;
I think it could be a really powerful voice, and I really hope that on the
whole we’re able to use the players’ voice for any role-modelling, and any
power that the brand of AFL football has, in a really positive way, rather than
as a negative label being applied to the players,” she concludes.
Grange’s
perspective on homophobia in football culture is not shared by AFL Media
Manager Patrick Keane.
When asked
if the AFL has even a slight problem with homophobia, he replies simply: “No,
we don’t.”
Nor will
Keane speculate, when invited to do so, as to why Britain’s Football Association sees
homophobia as a problem, whereas the AFL does not.
“I can’t
speak for the British Football Association, only the AFL,” Keane said.
When asked
to conjecture, he replied shortly, “No”.
On its
website, The Football Association (The FA) states that: ‘Male or female, an individual’s sexual orientation should never be a
barrier to people taking part in – and enjoying – our national sport … As the
guardian of the game in this country, The FA is uniquely placed to tackle
issues such as homophobia … we can – and will continue to – amend the laws of
the game to outlaw homophobic behaviour.’
The AFL, meanwhile, shows no such
commitment, as illustrated by its response to the case of Ken Campagnolo (a Victorian
football trainer who was sacked by the Bonnie Doon Football Club when his
bisexuality was made public).
Keane
agrees that the AFL is the peak body for football in this country, but says of the
organisation’s response to Campagnolo’s sacking and ongoing discrimination
claim: “That does not mean we are responsible for the actions taken by another
person at another completely different level of football.”
As the peak
body then, does he believe that the AFL has a moral obligation to lead other
clubs?
“Yes, and
we believe we do that,” Keane replies. But when asked if the AFL’s response to
Ken Campagnolo demonstrates moral leadership, Keane can only repeat, “I said,
we believe we do that”.
 While the
AFL is dragging its heels on this issue, other members of the football
fraternity are adamant that the sport has a moral obligation to tackle sexuality-based
discrimination. One such man is Eddie McGuire (pictured), the influential President of the
Collingwood Football Club.
“The one
thing that we are is the club for anyone who feels disassociated. We don’t care
what your race, religion, sex or sexual orientation is - we believe absolutely
in tolerance and respect and empathy,” McGuire tells MCV.
“We won’t
tolerate – as long as I’m president of the club anyway – we won’t tolerate any
form of discrimination.”
In terms of
fighting homophobia, the Collingwood President compares the issue to the AFL’s
successful battle to eliminate racism from the game.
“I refer it
back to the same principles as tackling racial vilification – when we started
to tackle racism, I had a lot of people come up to me and say ‘Thank god we’re
doing this: I used to shout racial abuse because I thought it was what you were
supposed to do, but I didn’t really believe it’. It’s the same classic pack
mentality in regards to sexual orientation, and football should be leading the
way in that regard,” McGuire concludes.
MCV editor Richard Watts was founder of the Collingwood supporters club the Pink Magpies.
 |
Tackling homophobia
Subscribe to this comment's feed