SXMCV AXN QLP CHERRIE BLAZE GAYTAS GAYNT ACTGAY CANVAS FT EVOLUTION

Media Partners

Sponsors

Banner

Subscribe to Newsletter

Please register on this site to receive the weekly Evolution Online newsletter.
Evolution Newsletter
Please register to the site before you can sign for a list.
No account yet? Register
Short film nets $2000 prize
p14_arts_250.jpgRichard Watts reports on the City of Melbourne Emerging Filmmaker’s Award.

Photo: Toby Schmitz and Joel McIlroy star in Sophie Hyde’s award-winning film, My Last Ten Hours With You.

Director Sophie Hyde of South Australia was $2000 richer last Saturday night, after her short film, My Last Ten Hours With You, was declared the winner of the City of Melbourne Emerging Filmmaker’s Award at the 2008 Melbourne Queer Film Festival.

The film explores the dying hours of a relationship between two gay men, Jeremy and Mark, as the former prepares to leaves Australia for Hanoi. Although Jeremy seems prepared for departure, with his thoughts in another land, Mark sweetly attempts to sabotage his plans, and desperately tries to remind Jeremy why he should not leave.

“Hyde deftly captures the abbreviated language and stilted behaviour of two men who know each other by heart and are clearly in love, yet increasingly unable to live together,” film critic Matt Riveria wrote of My Last Ten Hours With You.

Having already picked up an award for Best Film at Sydney’s Queer Screen film festival for the short drama, Hyde says she was surprised and delighted to score another win in Melbourne.

“[To win in] Melbourne is thrilling, particularly because we won the Audience Choice award as well, which is not something I ever anticipated we would win! That’s just so fabulous,” Hyde told MCV this week. “I feel very grateful and fortunate.  I wish I had been there, but my lovely sister was, so she got to get up for me.”

Given the accomplished and assured style of My Last Ten Hours With You, it comes as a surprise to learn that it is the first short drama Hyde has directed; a fact which – coupled with homophobia – meant that making the film was a difficult process.

“It was very difficult to get funding for the film,” Hyde explains.

“We first approached the South Australian Film Corporation who weren’t interested… [perhaps because] it’s quite a subtle script. It’s much more of an exploration than a telling, I think. And there were some pretty suspect questions about the gay content, which made me feel quite defensive and a bit angry, really.”  
So why did she set out to make a story about two gay men and the slow, painful death of their relationship?

“The loss and messiness and stilted communication is something I am very interested in,” she answers. “How do people relate to each other, why does it break down?” 

“I felt a lot of the themes came from conversations with many people, but a fair number of them were gay men. I feel very much that these men, characters like this, are part of my culture and my life experience, they are me and my friends. I grew up in a queer family, so it’s not something I consciously decided to explore; it’s just very much about the characters [and] the things I wanted to express.”

Comments (1)add comment
...
written by sophie hyde , March 25, 2008

Thought it best to clarify that the South Australian Film Corporation did eventually fund this film and were incredibly supportive.

The dubious questions about the gay content didn't, in fact, come from them.

Cheers,
Sophie Hyde

report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0


Write comment
smaller | bigger
password
 

busy